<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One month of Goplan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/</link>
	<description>A blog on Goplan, an online project management and collaboration tool by Webreakstuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oclenj</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-23720</link>
		<dc:creator>oclenj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-23720</guid>
		<description>Imagine czk4490 loop. Froogle has an abcba9e00e items checker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine czk4490 loop. Froogle has an abcba9e00e items checker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webreakstuff &#187; Catching up</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>Webreakstuff &#187; Catching up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-7207</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s now been one month since we launched Goplan (our project management and collaboration web-app)- it&#8217;s been quite exciting to get real [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s now been one month since we launched Goplan (our project management and collaboration web-app)- it&#8217;s been quite exciting to get real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-3101</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-3101</guid>
		<description>Re: Gantt Charts

I am as adament about using Gantt charts to help with project manangement as Jason Fried (of Basecamp) is about saying they will NEVER make them. Which is why I won&#039;t use Basecamp.

What is your take? Will Goplan offer Gantt chart reporting as a feature in the near future?

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Gantt Charts</p>
<p>I am as adament about using Gantt charts to help with project manangement as Jason Fried (of Basecamp) is about saying they will NEVER make them. Which is why I won&#8217;t use Basecamp.</p>
<p>What is your take? Will Goplan offer Gantt chart reporting as a feature in the near future?</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>Fred - Thanks for the reply. 

Using EC2 does rather explain things - we&#039;ve recently been testing it ourselves. As you point out, it certainly is solid. However, we&#039;ve been disappointed with the speed: latency in particular is poor in all the instances we&#039;ve tested, regardless of O/S. As an aside, what surprised me most is how slow the link between EC2 and S3 was!

Cameron: unfortunately it&#039;s not as simple as throwing more EC2 instances at the problem - I don&#039;t think that processor capacity is the bottleneck, more the general responsiveness of Amazon&#039;s cloud, though Fred will know exactly where the bottlenecks are occurring.

In the end, we went back to a traditional load-balanced cluster for performance reasons. Serves us right for trying to save a few quid...

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred &#8211; Thanks for the reply. </p>
<p>Using EC2 does rather explain things &#8211; we&#8217;ve recently been testing it ourselves. As you point out, it certainly is solid. However, we&#8217;ve been disappointed with the speed: latency in particular is poor in all the instances we&#8217;ve tested, regardless of O/S. As an aside, what surprised me most is how slow the link between EC2 and S3 was!</p>
<p>Cameron: unfortunately it&#8217;s not as simple as throwing more EC2 instances at the problem &#8211; I don&#8217;t think that processor capacity is the bottleneck, more the general responsiveness of Amazon&#8217;s cloud, though Fred will know exactly where the bottlenecks are occurring.</p>
<p>In the end, we went back to a traditional load-balanced cluster for performance reasons. Serves us right for trying to save a few quid&#8230;</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>* Speed, speed, speed.  Either more EC2 instances, or a beefier database, or more caching, something.

* Seeing all issues assigned to me, or tickets i&#039;ve created without having to go into each project.

* Down the road, the ability to email tickets would be fantastic.  I&#039;d like to setup a support@mydomain.com for customers, and have tickets created, so that Go Plan can be used as a support center.  
Lighthouse is doing some interesting things in this regard.

I really like the interface and potential, just please make it usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Speed, speed, speed.  Either more EC2 instances, or a beefier database, or more caching, something.</p>
<p>* Seeing all issues assigned to me, or tickets i&#8217;ve created without having to go into each project.</p>
<p>* Down the road, the ability to email tickets would be fantastic.  I&#8217;d like to setup a <a href="mailto:support@mydomain.com">support@mydomain.com</a> for customers, and have tickets created, so that Go Plan can be used as a support center.<br />
Lighthouse is doing some interesting things in this regard.</p>
<p>I really like the interface and potential, just please make it usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Oliveira</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Oliveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>James - first of all, thanks for leaving a comment. We are concerned that you don&#039;t find Goplan speedy enough - and rest assured we&#039;ll be doing whatever possible to bump the speed up. Right now Goplan is running on Amazon&#039;s EC2 platform and servers, which theoretically should mean &quot;fast&quot; (it does mean &quot;stable&quot;). We&#039;ll look into other options and definitely post something up about this.

Rest assured we&#039;ll be following up on this one. Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; first of all, thanks for leaving a comment. We are concerned that you don&#8217;t find Goplan speedy enough &#8211; and rest assured we&#8217;ll be doing whatever possible to bump the speed up. Right now Goplan is running on Amazon&#8217;s EC2 platform and servers, which theoretically should mean &#8220;fast&#8221; (it does mean &#8220;stable&#8221;). We&#8217;ll look into other options and definitely post something up about this.</p>
<p>Rest assured we&#8217;ll be following up on this one. Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.goplanapp.com/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/comment-page-1/#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goplan.info/2007/04/20/one-month-of-goplan/#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>I love the features you&#039;ve got in place - this software is pretty much everything I was hoping for and a definite BC killer.

But, I can&#039;t use it for everyday project management work. Why? The site is just too slow.

Page loads take 4-5 seconds to appear, compared with 1-2 seconds for Basecamp. AJAX requests sometimes timeout! Adding 2 or 3 tasks should take a few seconds. Instead, it&#039;s a job which requires a minute or more of staring at the screen while the page reloads.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - the software itself is excellent, I&#039;m just frustrated  by how slow it is. I&#039;ve showed it to a client and it was their first comment. I even signed up for a higher-rate plan to see if it would put me on a more responsive server! No joy :(

Please, folks - I&#039;d love to use this service more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the features you&#8217;ve got in place &#8211; this software is pretty much everything I was hoping for and a definite BC killer.</p>
<p>But, I can&#8217;t use it for everyday project management work. Why? The site is just too slow.</p>
<p>Page loads take 4-5 seconds to appear, compared with 1-2 seconds for Basecamp. AJAX requests sometimes timeout! Adding 2 or 3 tasks should take a few seconds. Instead, it&#8217;s a job which requires a minute or more of staring at the screen while the page reloads.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; the software itself is excellent, I&#8217;m just frustrated  by how slow it is. I&#8217;ve showed it to a client and it was their first comment. I even signed up for a higher-rate plan to see if it would put me on a more responsive server! No joy :(</p>
<p>Please, folks &#8211; I&#8217;d love to use this service more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
